Ghan (
ithika
) wrote
2006
-
05
-
18
02:18 am
God damn it, Leeroy!
Dial-up friendly version to come soon. (Dialup, pshhhhh.)
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
tattered-pinion.livejournal.com
2006-05-17 06:34 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
GIRL.
(But man, Peacocks, awesome)
no subject
tattered-pinion.livejournal.com
2006-05-17 06:45 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Also, you should have saved them as .bmp to pwn bandwith even more.
no subject
volandum.livejournal.com
2006-05-17 07:26 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Hee!
no subject
auntpol.livejournal.com
2006-05-18 12:10 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I should like to point out (in reference to : (Chuck Norris)^2=(Chuck Norris)^2, that it is always true that x^2=x^2.
Maybe (Chuck Norris)^2=Chuck Norris would have been more impressive?
no subject
http://users.livejournal.com/drayke_/
2006-05-19 12:06 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Maybe Chuck Norris = (Chuck Norris)^2 ?
OH MY GOD
WHAT DO YOU GET IF CHUCK NORRIS MULTIPLIES WITH CHUCK NORRIS?
yeah, you answer that.
no subject
grey-assassin.livejournal.com
2006-05-19 01:23 am (UTC)
(
link
)
mwahahahahah!!! Man.. we should never EVER be allowed to talk unsupervised!
6 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
(But man, Peacocks, awesome)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Maybe (Chuck Norris)^2=Chuck Norris would have been more impressive?
no subject
OH MY GOD
WHAT DO YOU GET IF CHUCK NORRIS MULTIPLIES WITH CHUCK NORRIS?
yeah, you answer that.
no subject